RETHINKING
ROBERT MOSES
He wasn’t jut the builder of highways and parks or the unelected figure who reshaped New York’s infrastructure.
The reverberating effects of Robert Moses determined the everyday realities of life across the entire tri-state region. His decisions influenced not only where people lived, but which communities had clean water, reliable transit, and political insulation, and which did not.
The highways he pushed through didn’t simply alter commutes; they sorted populations. They shaped who people met, who they married, who their children grew up alongside. Suburban boundaries hardened around access to cars, zoning protections, and public services, creating patterns of separation that persist long after the concrete set.
The recent election of a social democratic mayor on the promise of free buses shows how deeply this legacy still governs us. The map Moses left behind continues to dictate opportunity far beyond city limits, quietly shaping the intimate details of daily life in the region.
Rethinking Robert Moses
Co-op City
Co-op City
Freedomland was a colossal, optimistic fantasy of America. A place to wander and feel good about the stories we tell ourselves. An amusement park shaped like the country itself, planted on the very ground that would later become Co-op City. But even while the park was still going up, the real story of New York was shifting under everyone’s feet. Robert Moses was already reshaping how people lived and how they got anywhere at all. The city was being reengineered around the car. Highways spread across the boroughs like a nervous system, and life slowly became something you drove through rather than something that grew around you.
Co-op City sits right in the middle of that world Moses created. Two major highways slice through the development. Cars rush past constantly. Yet the community was built for people who often did not have the money for a car, which at the time was one of the clearest markers of rising into the middle class. The big promise instead was the final stop of the Second Avenue Subway. That stop never materialized, but people invested in the idea anyway. They believed the city would eventually meet them where they were.
The project was built on a beautiful idea of shared ownership. You could buy in. You could live with dignity and stability. But there was one quiet catch: you could not make a profit when you sold. It seemed almost noble at first, a safeguard against speculation. Over time, though, that detail has kept many residents stuck. Taxes rise. Maintenance charges rise. It begins to feel like rent again, only without the equity or upward mobility that usually comes with owning a home. Affordability is preserved, but the ladder that makes the middle class possible is weakened.
Co-op City lives inside that tension. Born from Moses’s world, boxed in by the roads he carved through the Bronx, yet still trying to offer something gentler and more humane. And in that tension you can still feel the echo of Freedomland, a place built on promises that never quite matched the world surrounding it.